Computerization and Computation
Whenever we try to define something suitable for our design intentions, it became somehow closely related to the design tool. The contemporary theory of computational design (or design computing) has many definitions. In this website, we look at that from the perspective of method and its theory underneath, not the tools; however, it finally comes to a point that we -again- start to talk about “tools”. Whatever, the purpose is “the process” or the associative geometries, even a diagram is again developed from the “computerization” of our minds. Some people call this “Algorithmic Thinking”, “Algorithmic Logic (?)” or “Algorithmic Architecture”. I think we always try to describe a distinction between our design intentions and the tools we use. We don’t usually accept that the tool affects the method and that the method affects subjective design domains. Kostas Terzidis in his 2006 book “Algorithmic Architecture” starts the discussion by declaring this distinction very clearly:
Computation is a term that differs from, but is often confused with, computerization. While computation is the procedure of calculating, i.e. determining something by mathematical or logical methods, computerization is the act of entering, processing, or storing information in a computer or a computer system. Computerization is about automation, mechanization, digitization, and conversion. Generally, it involves the digitization of entities or processes that are preconceived, predetermined, and well defined. In contrast, computation is about the exploration of indeterminate, vague, unclear, and often ill-defined processes; because of its exploratory nature, computation aims at emulating or extending the human intellect. It is about rationalization, reasoning, logic, algorithm, deduction, induction, extrapolation, exploration, and estimation. In its manifold implications, it involves problem solving, mental structures, cognition, simulation, and rule-based intelligence, to name a few.
The definition of such dualities clears our path of thought. However, very close relationships between “a computerized thing” and “a computational thing”, still remain. We might even say that a computerized design is a reason for computational design; or vice versa.
Cite this post
Related Posts
Intra)/value
August 16, 2026
The group exhibition 2 Years 10 Meters, curated by Natalia Schmidt, opened on April 24, 2024, at the Cité Internationale des Arts in Paris. My name was also included in the exhibition due to the projection graphics in Didem Yalınay’s artwork Intra)/value. This was another step in Didem’s long-term project. She hated being called a “Digital Artist.” She produced wonderful works with Seçkin Maden. I was fortunate enough to accompany her as a modest collaborator on one of her pieces….
A New Chapter
August 1, 2026
The logic of computer programming has fascinated me since childhood. The same way of thinking also lies behind design mathematics, which is now my main field of interest. Searching for the simplicity behind things, looking for the fundamentals, and identifying the most meaningful basic elements has always been my greatest challenge. With this intention, Designcoding went online in 2011. I tried to share my research, some student work, and news. While learning computational geometry, I wanted to teach it as…
Digital Design Topics in Architecture
January 8, 2018
Scientific publications are expected to relate to all areas of science they sprawl. For this, the scientific publication is associated with several keywords that are thought to be related. For proper access to scientific publications in literature research, keyword assignment is as important as the publication title. This study aimed to map the usage patterns of the concepts related to the field of digital design research through keyword analysis. The questions that motivate the research, focus on which concepts are…
CAD Smart Objects
May 23, 2014Another Turkish translation from my Ph.D. The paper is titled “CAD Smart Objects: Potentials and Limitations”, presented by Magdy Ibrahim, Robert Krawczyk, and George Shcipporeit at the 21st eCAADe Symposium in 2003. It is a brief introduction to today’s CAD and BIM concepts. You can find this paper in CuminCAD’s database. Below is the Turkish version, which I translated in 2005: CAD SMART OBJECTS: POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONSMagdy Ibrahim, Robert Krawczyk, George Shcipporeit Özet Yıllardır, BDT (bilgisayar destekli tasarım; Computer Aided…
Nonlinear Architecture
May 23, 2014This is my Turkish translation of the 1997 article by Charles Jencks, “Nonlinear Architecture: New Science = New Architecture?”. Very short but the cult text explains the emergence of a new technology-based architecture. Although very old, it is still an up-to-date discussion for computational design research. NON-LINEAR ARCHITECTURE: NEW SCIENCE = NEW ARCHITECTURE ? Charles Jencks Yüz yıldan beri pekçok mimar yeni oluşan yaşam koşullarının yeni bir mimarlığı doğuracağını söylemişlerdir. İronik olarak, bu söylemler Modernistler tarafından gelenekselleştirilmiş, ancak zaten bilinen…